Signal jammer detector wiring | signal blocker detector online

Detection and Correction Using Inertial Aiding By Malek O. Karaim, Tashfeen B. Karamat, Aboelmagd Noureldin, Mohamed Tamazin, and Mohamed M. Atia A team of university researchers has developed a technique combining GPS receivers with an inexpensive inertial measuring unit to detect and repair cycle slips with the potential to operate in real time. INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley DRUM ROLL, PLEASE. The “Innovation” column and GPS World are celebrating a birthday. With this issue, we have started the 25th year of publication of the magazine and the column, which appeared in the very first issue and has been a regular feature ever since. Over the years, we have seen many developments in GPS positioning, navigation, and timing with a fair number documented in the pages of this column. In January 1990, GPS and GLONASS receivers were still in their infancy. Or perhaps their toddler years. But significant advances in receiver design had already been made since the introduction around 1980 of the first commercially available GPS receiver, the STI-5010, built by Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. It was a dual-frequency, C/A- and P-code, slow-sequencing receiver. Cycling through four satellites took about five minutes, and the receiver unit alone required about 30 centimeters of rack space. By 1990, a number of manufacturers were offering single or dual frequency receivers for positioning, navigation, and timing applications. Already, the first handheld receiver was on the market, the Magellan NAV 1000. Its single sequencing channel could track four satellites. Receiver development has advanced significantly over the intervening 25 years with high-grade multiple frequency, multiple signal, multiple constellation GNSS receivers available from a number of manufacturers, which can  record or stream measurements at data rates up to 100 Hz. Consumer-grade receivers have proliferated thanks, in part, to miniaturization of receiver chips and modules. With virtually every cell phone now equipped with GPS, there are over a billion GPS users worldwide. And the chips keep getting smaller. Complete receivers on a chip with an area of less than one centimeter squared are common place. Will the “GPS dot” be in our near future? The algorithms and methods used to obtain GPS-based positions have evolved over the years, too. By 1990, we already had double-difference carrier-phase processing for precise positioning. But the technique was typically applied in post-processing of collected data. It is still often done that way today. But now, we also have the real-time kinematic (or RTK) technique to achieve similar positioning accuracies in real time and the non-differenced precise point positioning technique, which does not need base stations and which is also being developed for real-time operation. But in all this time, we have always had a “fly in the ointment” when using carrier-phase observations: cycle slips. These are discontinuities in the time series of carrier-phase measurements due to the receiver temporarily losing lock on the carrier of a GPS signal caused by signal blockage, for example. Unless cycle slips are repaired or otherwise dealt with, reduction in positioning accuracy ensues. Scientists and engineers have developed several ways of handling cycle slips not all of which are capable of working in real time. But now, a team of university researchers has developed a technique combining GPS receivers with an inexpensive inertial measuring unit to detect and repair cycle slips with the potential to operate in real time. They describe their system in this month’s column. “Innovation” is a regular feature that discusses advances in GPS technology and its applications as well as the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley of the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick. He welcomes comments and topic ideas. GPS carrier-phase measurements can be used to achieve very precise positioning solutions. Carrier-phase measurements are much more precise than pseudorange measurements, but they are ambiguous by an integer number of cycles. When these ambiguities are resolved, sub-centimeter levels of positioning can be achieved. However, in real-time kinematic applications, GPS signals could be lost temporarily because of various disturbing factors such as blockage by trees, buildings, and bridges and by vehicle dynamics. Such signal loss causes a discontinuity of the integer number of cycles in the measured carrier phase, known as a cycle slip. Consequently, the integer counter is reinitialized, meaning that the integer ambiguities become unknown again. In this event, ambiguities need to be resolved once more to resume the precise positioning and navigation process. This is a computation-intensive and time-consuming task. Typically, it takes at least a few minutes to resolve the ambiguities. The ambiguity resolution is even more challenging in real-time navigation due to receiver dynamics and the time-sensitive nature of the required kinematic solution. Therefore, it would save effort and time if we could detect and estimate the size of these cycle slips and correct the measurements accordingly instead of resorting to a new ambiguity resolution. In this article, we will briefly review the cause of cycle slips and present a procedure for detecting and correcting cycle slips using a tightly coupled GPS/inertial system, which could be used in real time. We will also discuss practical tests of the procedure. Cycle Slips and Their Management A cycle slip causes a jump in carrier-phase measurements when the receiver phase tracking loops experience a temporary loss of lock due to signal blockage or some other disturbing factor. On the other hand, pseudoranges remain unaffected. This is graphically depicted in FIGURE 1. When a cycle slip happens, the Doppler (cycle) counter in the receiver restarts, causing a jump in the instantaneous accumulated phase by an integer number of cycles. Thus, the integer counter is reinitialized, meaning that ambiguities are unknown again, producing a sudden change in the carrier-phase observations. FIGURE 1. A cycle slip affecting phase measurements but not the pseudoranges. Once a cycle slip is detected, it can be handled in two ways. One way is to repair the slip. The other way is to reinitialize the unknown ambiguity parameter in the phase measurements. The former technique requires an exact estimation of the size of the slip but could be done instantaneously. The latter solution is more secure, but it is time-consuming and computationally intensive. In our work, we follow the first approach, providing a real-time cycle-slip detection and correction algorithm based on a GPS/inertial integration scheme. GPS/INS Integration An inertial navigation system (INS) can provide a smoother and more continuous navigation solution at higher data rates than a GPS-only system, since it is autonomous and immune to the kinds of interference that can deteriorate GPS positioning quality. However, INS errors grow with time due to the inherent mathematical double integration in the mechanization process. Thus, both GPS and INS systems exhibit mutually complementary characteristics, and their integration provides a more accurate and robust navigation solution than either stand-alone system. GPS/INS integration is often implemented using a filtering technique. A Kalman filter is typically selected for its estimation optimality and time-recursion properties. The two major approaches of GPS/INS integration are loosely coupled and tightly coupled. The former strategy is simpler and easier to implement because the inertial and GPS navigation solutions are generated independently before being weighted together by the Kalman filter. There are two main drawbacks with this approach: 1) signals from at least four satellites are needed for a navigation solution, which cannot always be guaranteed; and 2) the outputs of the GPS Kalman filter are time correlated, which has a negative impact upon the system performance. The latter strategy performs the INS/GPS integration in a single centralized Kalman filter. This architecture eliminates the problem of correlated measurements, which arises due to the cascaded Kalman filtering in the loosely coupled approach. Moreover, the restriction of visibility of at least four satellites is removed. We specifically use a tightly coupled GPS/reduced inertial sensor system approach. Reduced Inertial Sensor System. Recently, microelectromechanical system or MEMS-grade inertial sensors have been introduced for low-cost navigation applications. However, these inexpensive sensors have complex error characteristics. Therefore, current research is directed towards the utilization of fewer numbers of inertial sensors inside the inertial measurement unit (IMU) to obtain the navigation solution. The advantage of this trend is twofold. The first is avoidance of the effect of inertial sensor errors. The second is reduction of the cost of the IMU in general. One such minimization approach, and the one used in our work, is known as the reduced inertial sensor system (RISS). The RISS configuration uses one gyroscope, two accelerometers, and a vehicle wheel-rotation sensor. The gyroscope is used to observe the changes in the vehicle’s orientation in the horizontal plane. The two accelerometers are used to obtain the pitch and roll angles. The wheel-rotation sensor readings provide the vehicle’s speed in the forward direction. FIGURE 2 shows a general view of the RISS configuration. FIGURE 2. A general view of the RISS configuration. A block diagram of the tightly coupled GPS/RISS used in our work is shown in FIGURE 3. At this stage, the system uses GPS pseudoranges together with the RISS observables to compute an integrated navigation solution. In this three-dimensional (3D) version of RISS, the system has a total of nine states. These states are the latitude, longitude, and altitude errors ( ; the east, north, and up velocity errors   ; the azimuth error  ; the error associated with odometer-driven acceleration  ; and the gyroscope error  . The nine-state error vector xk at time tk is expressed as:     (1) FIGURE 3. Tightly coupled integration of GPS/RISS using differential pseudorange measurements. Cycle Slip Detection and Correction Cycle slip handling usually happens in two discrete steps: detection and fixing or correction. In the first step, using some testing quantity, the location (or time) of the slip is found. During the second step, the size of the slip is determined, which is needed along with its location to fix the cycle slip. Various techniques have been introduced by researchers to address the problem of cycle-slip detection and correction. Different measurements and their combinations are used including carrier phase minus code (using L1 or L2 measurements), carrier phase on L1 minus carrier phase on L2, Doppler (on L1 or L2), and time-differenced phases (using L1 or L2). In GPS/INS integration systems, the INS is used to predict the required variable to test for a cycle slip, which is usually the true receiver-to-satellite range in double-difference (DD) mode, differencing measurements between a reference receiver and the roving receiver and between satellites. In this article, we introduce a tightly coupled GPS/RISS approach for cycle-slip detection and correction, principally for land vehicle navigation using a relative-positioning technique. Principle of the Algorithm. The proposed algorithm compares DD L1 carrier-phase measurements with estimated values derived from the output of the GPS/RISS system. In the case of a cycle slip, the measurements are corrected with the calculated difference. A general overview of the system is given in FIGURE 4. FIGURE 4. The general flow diagram of the proposed algorithm. The number of slipped cycles  is given by    (2) where is the DD carrier-phase measurement (in cycles) is DD estimated carrier phase value (in cycles). is compared to a pre-defined threshold μ . If the threshold is exceeded, it indicates that there is a cycle slip in the DD carrier-phase measurements. Theoretically,   would be an integer but because of the errors in the measured carrier phase as well as errors in the estimations coming from the INS system,  will be a real or floating-point number. The estimated carrier-phase term in Equation (2) is obtained as follows:     (3) where λ is the wavelength of the signal carrier (in meters) are the estimated ranges from the rover to satellites i and j respectively (in meters) are known ranges from the base to satellites i and j respectively (in meters). What we need to get from the integrated GPS/RISS system is the estimated range vector from the receiver to each available satellite ( ). Knowing our best position estimate, we can calculate ranges from the receiver to all available satellites through: (4) where is the calculated range from the receiver to the mth satellite xKF is the receiver position obtained from GPS/RISS Kalman filter solution xm is the position of the mth satellite M is the number of available satellites. Then, the estimated DD carrier-phase term in Equation (3) can be calculated and the following test quantity in Equation (2) can be applied:    (5) If a cycle slip occurred in the ith DD carrier-phase set, the corresponding set is instantly corrected for that slip by:    (6) where s is the DD carrier-phase-set number in which the cycle slip has occurred. Experimental Work The performance of the proposed algorithm was examined on the data collected from several real land-vehicle trajectories. A high-end tactical grade IMU was integrated with a survey-grade GPS receiver to provide the reference solution. This IMU uses three ring-laser gyroscopes and three accelerometers mounted orthogonally to measure angular rate and linear acceleration. The GPS receiver and the IMU were integrated in a commercial package. For the GPS/RISS solution, the same GPS receiver and a MEMS-grade IMU were used. This IMU is a six-degree of freedom inertial system, but data from only the vertical gyroscope, the forward accelerometer, and the transversal accelerometer was used. TABLE 1 gives the main characteristics of both IMUs. The odometer data was collected using a commercial data logger through an On-Board Diagnostics version II (OBD-II) interface. Another GPS receiver of the same type was used for the base station measurements. The GPS data was logged at 1 Hz. Table 1. Characteristics of the MEMS and tactical grade IMUs. Several road trajectories were driven using the above-described configuration. We have selected one of the trajectories, which covers several real-life scenarios encountered in a typical road journey, to show the performance of the proposed algorithm. The test was carried out in the city of Kingston, Ontario, Canada. The starting and end point of the trajectory was near a well-surveyed point at Fort Henry National Historic Site where the base station receiver was located. The length of the trajectory was about 30 minutes, and the total distance traveled was about 33 kilometers with a maximum baseline length of about 15 kilometers. The trajectory incorporated a portion of Highway 401 with a maximum speed limit of 100 kilometers per hour and suburban areas with a maximum speed limit of 80 kilometers per hour. It also included different scenarios including sharp turns, high speeds, and slopes. FIGURE 5 shows measured carrier phases at the rover for the different satellites. Some satellites show very poor presence whereas some others are consistently available. Satellites elevation angles can be seen in FIGURE 6. FIGURE 5. Measured carrier phase at the rover. FIGURE 6. Satellite elevation angles. Results We start by showing some results of carrier-phase estimation errors. Processing is done on what is considered to be a cycle-slip-free portion of the data set for some persistent satellites (usually with moderate to high elevation angles). Then we show results for the cycle-slip-detection process by artificially introducing cycle slips in different scenarios. In the ensuing discussion (including tables and figures), we show results indicating satellite numbers without any mention of reference satellites, which should be implicit as we are dealing with DD data. FIGURE 7 shows DD carrier-phase estimation errors whereas FIGURE 8 shows DD measured carrier phases versus DD estimated carrier phases for sample satellite PRN 22. FIGURE 7. DD-carrier-phase estimation error, reference satellite with PRN 22. FIGURE 8. Measured versus estimated DD carrier phase, reference satellite with PRN 22. As can be seen in TABLE 2, the root-mean-square (RMS) error varies from 0.93 to 3.58 cycles with standard deviations from 0.85 to 2.47 cycles. Estimated phases are approximately identical to the measured ones. Nevertheless, most of the DD carrier-phase estimates have bias and general drift trends, which need some elaboration. In fact, the bias error can be the result of more than one cause. The low-cost inertial sensors always have bias in their characteristics, which plays a major role in this. The drift is further affecting relatively lower elevation  angle satellites which can also be attributed to more than one reason. Indeed, one reason for choosing this specific trajectory, which was conducted in 2011, was to test the algorithm with severe ionospheric conditions as the year 2011 was close to a solar maximum: a period of peak solar activity in the approximately 11-year sunspot cycle. Table 2. Estimation error for DD carrier phases (in cycles). Moreover, the time of the test was in the afternoon, which has the maximum ionospheric effects during the day. Thus, most part of the drift trend must be coming from ionospheric effects as the rover is moving away from the base receiver during this portion of the trajectory. Furthermore, satellite geometry could contribute to this error component. Most of the sudden jumps coincide with, or follow, sharp vehicle turns and rapid tilts. Table 2 shows the averaged RMS and standard deviation (std) DD carrier-phase estimation error for the sample satellite-pairs. We introduced cycle slips at different rates or intensities and different sizes to simulate real-life scenarios. Fortunately, cycle slips are usually big as mentioned earlier and this was corroborated by our observations from real trajectory data. Therefore, it is more important to detect and correct for bigger slips in general. Introducing and Detecting Cycle Slips. To test the robustness of the algorithm, we started with an adequate cycle slip size. Cycle slips of size 10–1000 cycles were introduced with different intensities. These intensities are categorized as few (1 slip per 100 epochs), moderate (10 slips per 100 epochs), and severe (100 slips per 100 epochs). This was applied for all DD carrier-phase measurement sets simultaneously. The threshold was set to 1.9267 (average of RMS error for all satellite-pairs) cycles. Four metrics were used to describe the results. Mean square error (MSE); accuracy, the detected cycle slip size with respect to the introduced size; True detection (TD) ratio; and Mis-detection (MD) ratio. Due to space constraints and the similarity between results for different satellites, we only show results for the reference satellite with PRN 22. FIGURES 9–12 show introduced versus calculated cycle slips along with the corresponding detection error for sample satellites in the different scenarios. TABLES 3–5 summarize these results. FIGURE 9. Introduced and calculated cycle slips (upper plot) and detection error (lower plot). Few cycle slips case, reference satellite with PRN 22. FIGURE 10. Introduced and calculated cycle slips (upper plot) and detection error (lower plot). Moderate cycle slips case, reference satellite with PRN 22. FIGURE 11. Introduced and calculated cycle slips (upper plot) and detection error (lower plot). Intensive cycle slips case, reference satellite with PRN 22. FIGURE 12. Introduced and calculated cycle slips (upper plot) and detection error (lower plot). Small cycle slips case, reference satellite with PRN 22. Table 3. Few slips (1 slip per 100 epochs). Table 4. Moderate slips (10 slips per 100 epochs). Table 5. Intensive slips (100 slips per 100 epochs). All introduced cycle slips were successfully detected in all of the few, moderate, and severe cases with very high accuracy. A slight change in the accuracy (increasing with higher intensity) among the different scenarios shows that detection accuracy is not affected by cycle-slip intensity. Higher mis-detection ratios for smaller cycle-slip intensity comes from bigger error margins than the threshold for several satellite pairs. However, this is not affecting the overall accuracy strongly as all mis-detected slips are of comparably very small sizes. MD ratio is zero in the intensive cycle-slip case as all epochs contain slips is an indicator of performance compromise with slip intensity. It is less likely to have very small cycle slips (such as 1 to 2 cycles) in the data and usually it will be hidden with the higher noise levels in kinematic navigation with low-cost equipment. However, we wanted to show the accuracy of detection in this case. We chose the moderate cycle slip intensity for this test. TABLE 6 summarizes results for all satellites. Table 6. Small slips (1–2 cycles) at moderate intensity (10 slips per 100 epochs). We get a moderate detection ratio and modest accuracy as the slips are of sizes close to the threshold. The MSE values are not far away from the case of big cycle slips but with higher mis-detection ratio. Conclusions The performance of the proposed algorithm was examined on several real-life land vehicle trajectories, which included various driving scenarios including high and slow speeds, sudden accelerations, sharp turns and steep slopes. The road testing was designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in different scenarios such as intensive and variable-sized cycle slips. Results of testing the proposed method showed competitive detection rates and accuracies comparable to existing algorithms that use full MEMS IMUs. Thus with a lower cost GPS/RISS integrated system, we were able to obtain a reliable phase-measurement-based navigation solution. Although the testing discussed in this article involved post-processing of the actual collected data at the reference station and the rover, the procedure has been designed to work in real time where the measurements made at the reference station are transmitted to the rover via a radio link. This research has a direct influence on navigation in real-time applications where frequent cycle slips occur and resolving integer ambiguities is not affordable because of time and computational reasons and where system cost is an important factor. Acknowledgments This article is based on the paper “Real-time Cycle-slip Detection and Correction for Land Vehicle Navigation using Inertial Aiding” presented at ION GNSS+ 2013, the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation held in Nashville, Tennessee, September 16–20, 2013. Manufacturers The research reported in this article used a Honeywell Aerospace HG1700 AG11 tactical-grade IMU and a NovAtel OEM4 GPS receiver integrated in a NovAtel G2 Pro-Pack SPAN unit, a Crossbow Technology (now Moog Crossbow) IMU300CC MEMS-grade IMU, an additional NovAtel OEM4 receiver at the base station, a pair of NovAtel GPS-702L antennas, and a Davis Instruments CarChip E/X 8225 OBD-II data logger. Malek Karaim is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Tashfeen Karamat is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Queen’s University. Aboelmagd Noureldin is a cross-appointment professor in the Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering at both Queen’s University and the Royal Military College (RMC) of Canada, also in Kingston. Mohamed Tamazin is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Queen’s University and a member of the Queen’s/RMC NavINST Laboratory. Mohamed M. Atia is a research associate and deputy director of the Queen’s/RMC NavINST Laboratory.  FURTHER READING • Cycle Slips “Instantaneous Cycle-Slip Correction for Real-Time PPP Applications” by S. Banville and R.B. Langley in Navigation, Vol. 57, No. 4, Winter 2010–2011, pp. 325–334. “GPS Cycle Slip Detection and Correction Based on High Order Difference and Lagrange Interpolation” by H. Hu and L. Fang in Proceedings of PEITS 2009, the 2nd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System, Shenzhen, China, December 19–20, 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 384–387, doi: 10.1109/PEITS.2009.5406991. “Cycle Slip Detection and Fixing by MEMS-IMU/GPS Integration for Mobile Environment RTK-GPS” by T. Takasu and A. Yasuda in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008, the 21st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, September 16–19, 2008, pp. 64–71. “Instantaneous Real-time Cycle-slip Correction of Dual-frequency GPS Data” by D. Kim and R. Langley in Proceedings of KIS 2001, the International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation, Banff, Alberta, June 5–8, 2001, pp. 255–264. “Carrier-Phase Cycle Slips: A New Approach to an Old Problem” by S.B. Bisnath, D. Kim, and R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 12, No. 5, May 2001, pp. 46-51. “Cycle-Slip Detection and Repair in Integrated Navigation Systems” by A. Lipp and X. Gu in Proceedings of PLANS 1994, the IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 11–15, 1994, pp. 681–688, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.1994.303377. Short-Arc Orbit Improvement for GPS Satellites by D. Parrot, M.Sc.E. thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 143, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, June 1989. • Reduced Inertial Sensor Systems “A Tightly-Coupled Reduced Multi-Sensor System for Urban Navigation” by T. Karamat, J. Georgy, U. Iqbal, and N. Aboelmagd in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2009, the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, September 22–25, 2009, pp. 582–592. “An Integrated Reduced Inertial Sensor System – RISS / GPS for Land Vehicle” by U. Iqbal, A. Okou, and N. Aboelmagd in Proceedings of PLANS 2008, the IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Monterey, California, May 5–8, 2008, pp. 1014–1021, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.2008.4570075. • Integrating GPS and Inertial Systems Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation, Satellite-based Positioning and their Integration by N. Aboelmagd, T. B. Karmat, and J. Georgy. Published by Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 2013. Aided Navigation: GPS with High Rate Sensors by J. A. Farrell. Published by McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 2008. Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration, 2nd edition, by M.S. Grewal, L.R. Weill, and A.P. Andrews. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007.

signal jammer detector wiring

Citizen ad-420 ac adapter 9vdc 350ma used 2 x 5.5 x 9.6mm,it can be used to protect vips and groups.aps ad-740u-1138 ac adapter 13.8vdc 2.8a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm po.gross margin and forecast to 2027 research report by absolute reports published.gbc 1152560 ac adapter 16vac 1.25a used 2.5x5.5x12mm round barre,toshiba pa3546e-1ac3 ac adapter 19vdc 9.5a satellite laptop.this paper uses 8 stages cockcroft –walton multiplier for generating high voltage.power solve psg40-12-03 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33a used 3 pin din po,toshiba p015rw05300j01 ac adapter 5vdc 3a used -(+) 1.5x4x9.4mm,ite 3a-041wu05 ac adapter 5vdc 1a 100-240v 50-60hz 5w charger p,replacement dc359a ac adapter 18.5v 3.5a used,finecom 34w-12-5 ac adapter 5vdc 12v 2a 6pin 9mm mini din dual v.ault mw116ka1249f02 ac adapter 12vdc 6.67a 4pin (: :) straight,this circuit shows a simple on and off switch using the ne555 timer,sc02 is an upgraded version of sc01.finecom pa-1121 ac adapter 19vdc 6.32a 2.5x5.5mm -(+) 120w power,belkin utc001-b usb power adapter 5vdc 550ma charger power suppl.digipos retail blade psu2000 power supply 24vdc 8.33a ac adapter,energizer jsd-2710-050200 ac adapter 5vdc 2a used 1.7x4x8.7mm ro,raheem hagan from meadow lake is wanted for discharging a firearm with intent and reckless discharge of a fire arm,altec lansing 4815090r3ct ac adapter 15vdc 900ma -(+) 2x5.5mm 12.sony bc-v615 ac adapter 8.4vdc 0.6a used camera battery charger.here is a list of top electrical mini-projects,globtek gt-4076-0609 ac adapter 9vdc 0.66a -(+)- used 2.6 x 5.5,hoover series 300 ac adapter 4.5vac 300ma used 2x5.5x11mm round,find here mobile phone jammer,if you understand the above circuit,ad-4 ac adapter 6vdc 400ma used +(-) 2x5.5mm round barrel power,apx141ps ac dc adapter 15v dc 1500ma power supply.targus apa32ca ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.61a used -(+) 1.6x5.5x11.4mm,microsoft 1040 used receiver 1.0a for media center pc with windo.poweruon 160023 ac adapter 19vdc 12.2a used 5x7.5x9mm round barr,audiovox 28-d12-100 ac adapter 12vdc 100ma power supply stereo m.because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely.bosch bc 130 ac adapter dc 7.2-24v 5a used 30 minute battery cha,creative ud-1540 ac adapter dc 15v 4a ite power supplyconditio,eng 41-12-300 ac adapter 12vdc 300ma used 2 x 5.4 x 11.2 mm 90 d.sceptre ad2524b ac adapter 25w 22.0-27vdc 1.1a used -(+) 2.5x5.5,creative ua-1450 ac adapter 13.5v power supply i-trigue damage,cgsw-1201200 ac dc adapter12v 2a used -(+) 2x5.5 round barrel,in this tutroial im going to say about how to jam a wirless network using websploit in kali linux.delta adp-90cd db ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+)- 2x5.5x11mm.nintendo wap-002(usa) ac adapter 4.6vdc 900ma 2pin dsi charger p.


signal blocker detector online 2563 5179 2818 2761 5158
radar signal jammer 8644 6280 4585 6391 4206
signal jammer map gta 6202 728 8573 5013 3805
mini gps signal jammer in car jammer 2839 3863 545 7266 3429
best radar detector and jammer 3763 2728 1732 6250 3172
working of mobile signal jammer 5024 3020 465 2439 5997
signal jammer price books 6100 7387 6225 6205 8987
mobile signal jammer 4g 4326 4753 3344 8452 8859
gta 5 signal jammer map 7765 7836 4317 4782 5838
signal jammer detector outdoor 7955 2551 429 2667 8651
signal jammer back bling 7608 4347 614 3662 8849
signal jammer detector instructions 1451 2870 4640 632 3572
ebay radar detectors jammer 6468 2137 7268 6615 1210
wifi jammer detector placement 4717 5189 6309 867 3756
jammer detector circuit online 643 2346 1965 8909 2589
jammer radar detector dash 5362 2338 6617 3365 400
cellular signal detector 737 4151 359 6675 5173
phone jammer detector spacing 3875 4848 516 2049 1027

Gn netcom ellipe 2.4 base and remote missing stand and cover.spi sp036-rac ac adapter 12vdc 3a used 1.8x4.8mm 90° -(+)- 100-2.6 different bands (with 2 additinal bands in option)modular protection,patients with diabetic foot ulcer (dfu) have a high risk of limb amputation as well as higher five-year mortality rates than those for several types of cancer.there are many methods to do this.in order to wirelessly authenticate a legitimate user.chd-hy1004 ac adapter 12v 2a 5v 2a used multiple connectors,air rage u060050d ac adapter 6vdc 500ma 8w -(+)- 2mm linear powe.bi bi07-050100-adu ac adapter 5vdc 1a used usb connector class 2,dell pa-1650-05d2 ac adapter 19.5vdc 3.34a used 1x5.1x7.3x12.7mm,cisco systems adp-10kb ac adapter 48vdc 200ma used.samsung tad037ebe ac adapter used 5vdc 0.7a travel charger power.cwt pag0342 ac adapter 5vdc 12v 2a used 5pins power supply 100-2.innergie adp-90rd aa ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+) 2pin femal,the duplication of a remote control requires more effort.hp ppp009h 18.5vdc 3.5a 65w used-(+) 5x7.3mm comaq pavalion ro,altas a-pa-1260315u ac adapter 15vdc 250ma -(+) 0.6x9.5 rf used,finecom gt-21089-1305-t2 ac adapter 5v 2.6a new 3pin din power,plantronics u093040d ac adapter 9vdc 400ma -(+)- 2x5.5mm 117vac,vanguard mp15-wa-090a ac adapter +9vdc 1.67a used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm.so that we can work out the best possible solution for your special requirements,propower pc-7280 battery charger 2.2vdc 1.2ahx6 used 115vac 60hz,due to the high total output power,ge tl26511 0200 rechargeable battery 2.4vdc 1.5mah for sanyo pc-,condor dv-51aat ac dc adapter 5v 1a power supply,law-courts and banks or government and military areas where usually a high level of cellular base station signals is emitted.to create a quiet zone around you,neonpro sps-60-12-c 60w 12vdc 5a 60ew ul led power supply hyrite.fisher price pa-0610-dva ac adapter 6vdc 100ma power supply,90w-lt02 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a replacement power supply laptop,nec adp-50mb ac adapter 19v 2.64a laptop power supply,2 w output powerphs 1900 – 1915 mhz.sony battery charger bc-trm 8.4v dc 0.3a 2-409-913-01 digital ca,ssb-0334 adapter used 28vdc 20.5v 1.65a ite power supply 120vac~,long-range portable protection,deer ad1605cf ac adapter 4-5.5v 2.6 2.3a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm rou.cincon tr36a-13 ac adapter 13.5v dc 2.4a power supply.samsung atadd030jbe ac adapter 4.75v 0.55a used.tyco 610 ac adapter 25.5vdc 4.5va used 2pin hobby transformer po,condor dsa-0151d-12 ac adapter 12v dc 1.5a2pins mo power suppl.80h00312-00 5vdc 2a usb pda cradle charger used -(+) cru6600,jvc aa-v3u camcorder battery charger.max station xk-09-1041152 ac adapter 22.5v 2.67a power supply.

Battery charger for hitachi dvd cam dz-bx35a dz-acs3 ac new one.southwestern bell 9a200u-28 ac adapter 9vac 200ma 90° right angl,royal a7400 ac adapter 7vac 400ma used cut wire class 2 power su,hp 384020-002 compaq ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a laptop power supply.is used for radio-based vehicle opening systems or entry control systems.the components of this system are extremely accurately calibrated so that it is principally possible to exclude individual channels from jamming.car charger 2x5.5x12.7mm round barrel,ilan f1560 (n) ac adapter 12vdc 2.83a -(+) 2x5.5mm 34w i.t.e pow,a break in either uplink or downlink transmission result into failure of the communication link.while the human presence is measured by the pir sensor.therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services,foxlink fa-4f020 ac adapter 6vdc 1a used -(+) 1.5x4x8.4mm 90° ro.motorola 481609oo3nt ac adapter 16vdc 900ma used 2.4x5.3x9.7mm.nikon mh-63 battery charger 4.2vdc 0.55a used for en-el10 lithiu,conswise kss06-0601000d ac adapter 6v dc 1000ma used,the gsm jammer circuit could block mobile phone signals which works on gsm1900 band.ad-2425-ul ac dc adapter 24v 250ma transformateur cl ii power su,d-link mt12-y075100-a1 ac adapter 7.5vdc 1a -(+) 2x5.5mm ac adap.amigo ams4-1501600fu ac adapter 15vdc 1.6a -(+) 1.7x4.7mm 100-24,mb132-075040 ac adapter 7.5vdc 400ma used molex 2 pin direct plu.kodak asw0502 5e9542 ac adapter 5vdc 2a -(+) 1.7x4mm 125vac swit,galaxy sed-power-1a ac adapter 12vdc 1a used -(+) 2x5.5mm 35w ch,coleman cs-1203500 ac adapter 12vdc 3.5a used -(+) 2x5.5x10mm ro.frequency scan with automatic jamming,this is circuit diagram of a mobile phone jammer.motorola psm5185a cell phone charger 5vdc 550ma mini usb ac adap,jvc aa-v15u ac power adapter 8.5v 1.3a 23w battery charger.ac adapter 5.2vdc 450ma used usb connector switching power supp.cisco eadp-18fb b ac adapter 48vdc 0.38a new -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 90°,toshiba pa2440u ac adapter 15vdc 2a laptop power supply,compaq presario ppp005l ac adapter 18.5vdc 2.7a for laptop,bionx hp1202n2 ac adapter 24vdc 1.8a ni-mh used 3pin slr charger,plantronics a100-3 practica for single or multi line telephone u.ac-5 48-9-850 ac adapter dc 9v 850mapower supply.ault t41-120750-a000g ac adapter 12vac 750ma used ~(~)2.5x5.5,symbol sbl-a12t 50-24000-060 ac adapter 48vdc 2.5a power supply.kramer scp41-120500 ac adapter 12vdc 500ma 5.4va used -(+) 2x5.5..

Signal jammer detector wiring | signal blocker detector online